Judge Rejects New York’s Stop-and-Frisk Policy

August 13, 2013

 

In a 195 page decision, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin rules that stop-and-frisk, as implemented over the last decade, has demonstrated a blatant disregard for the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, protecting against a government’s unreasonable searches and seizures as well as upholding the equal protection clause, respectively.  Emphasizing the overtly discriminatory manner of stops and frisks (“…83% of the [4.43 million] stops between 2004 and 2012 involved blacks and Hispanics, even though these two demographics make up just slightly more than 50% of the city’s residents.” Nearly 90% of those stopped are released, as no basis for arrest is found.), Judge Scheindlin ordered numerous remedies and a pilot program to enforce the use of body cameras on NYPD to record street encounters.  Additional reforms to the implementation of stop-and-frisk will take form of revised training procedures.

 

Read More:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.html?_r=0

Please reload

Featured Posts

BLH and the Stop-and-Frisk Litigation Team Request a Moratorium on NYPD Social-Distancing Enforcement

May 26, 2020

Today, the attorneys behind two of the three landmark class action lawsuits  that challenged the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk and trespass enforcement practi...

1/5
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

99 Park Avenue, PH/26th Floor | New York, NY 10016  |  P: 212.490.0400 |  F: 212.277.5880 

© 2020 Beldock Levine & Hoffman LLP

Disclaimer. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.