Judge Rejects New York’s Stop-and-Frisk Policy

August 13, 2013

 

In a 195 page decision, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin rules that stop-and-frisk, as implemented over the last decade, has demonstrated a blatant disregard for the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, protecting against a government’s unreasonable searches and seizures as well as upholding the equal protection clause, respectively.  Emphasizing the overtly discriminatory manner of stops and frisks (“…83% of the [4.43 million] stops between 2004 and 2012 involved blacks and Hispanics, even though these two demographics make up just slightly more than 50% of the city’s residents.” Nearly 90% of those stopped are released, as no basis for arrest is found.), Judge Scheindlin ordered numerous remedies and a pilot program to enforce the use of body cameras on NYPD to record street encounters.  Additional reforms to the implementation of stop-and-frisk will take form of revised training procedures.

 

Read More:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.html?_r=0

Please reload

Featured Posts

BLH Client Huwe Burton, Exonerated after 19 Years in Prison, Featured in HBO Series

November 26, 2019

BLH Client Huwe Burton, exonerated on January 24, 2019 after serving 19 years for the murder of his mother, which he did not commit, was interviewed b...

1/4
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

99 Park Avenue, PH/26th Floor | New York, NY 10016  |  P: 212.490.0400 |  F: 212.277.5880 

© 2019 Beldock Levine & Hoffman LLP

Disclaimer. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.